Is 300: Rise Of an Empire Worth Watching? Breaking Down The 300 Follow-Up’s Reviews & Rotten Tomatoes Scores

300: Many 300 fans are debating whether to see Zack Snyder’s little-known 2014 sequel, 300: Rise of an Empire, to the critically acclaimed original picture. The movie supplemented the events of the movie by presenting another war that was happening about the same time as Leonidas’ fight at Thermopylae, serving as both a prequel and a sequel to the 300 timelines. Although 300 remains a huge hit, 300: Rise of an Empire is less well-known, and many people who saw the first movie have not seen it yet.

One of director Zack Snyder’s greatest hits, 300 tells the tale of the Battle of Thermopylae, in which King Leonidas and his 300 Spartans faced off against the far larger Persian force. Based on the same-titled comic book series, the film 300 was a big hit, grossing $456 million on a $60 million budget and winning praise from critics. Following in the footsteps of the first film, 300: Rise of an Empire, was an attempt to profit from the popularity of the first 300.

SUMMARY 300: Rise of an Empire examines another conflict that took place around the same era of Thermopylae, serving as both a precursor and a sequel to 300.
On Rotten Tomatoes, the movie has a 45% critic score based on a variety of reviews. Eva Green’s performance and the action were acclaimed by some.

Fans of historical action epics like 300 might still appreciate 300: Rise of an Empire, despite it not receiving as much praise as the first film.

300: Rise Of an Empire Has A 45% score From Critics on Rotten Tomatoes

The movie’s Rotten Tomatoes audience score is 51%

The film 300: Rise of an Empire received a lower critical reception than its predecessor from 2006; as of the time this article was written, critics have given it a 45% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. This is in line with the conflicting and unfavorable reviews that the sequel garnered upon its debut, with few critics finding 300: Rise of an Empire particularly impressive. The movie was not extremely popular with ordinary audiences either; 300: Rise of an Empire only had a 51% audience score, which means that typical viewers liked it marginally better than critics.

Though not much, 300: Rise of an Empire has a worse Rotten Tomatoes score than 300. While critics loved 300 more on average, the difference was not statistically significant (the first 300 movie received a score of just 61%). When comparing 300 to 300: Rise of an Empire, the audience score of 300 is far better at 89% compared to 51% on Rotten Tomatoes. For public audiences, this means that although critics are often greater admirers of the first 300, this is also the case.

300: Rise Of an Empire’s Reviews Praise Its Action Gore & Eva Green’s Performance but Compare It Unfavorably To 300

It did not live up to Snyder’s original

The film 300: Rise of an Empire has received mixed reviews, with some sections being enjoyed by audiences and others not. This is reflected in its Rotten Tomatoes score. The action in the movie is what makes it the most enjoyable, with many praising the gore and combat scenes—something 300 did very well. One of the best parts of the movie is Eva Green’s portrayal of the Greek queen Artemisia, which has also received praise.

Even then, these sections of 300: Rise of an Empire fall short of comparable sections in 300. Even while there is fantastic action, it is difficult to top Zack Snyder’s renowned 300 action scenes, some of which helped to define the director’s approach. Furthermore, almost all the performances in 300 are legendary, largely because of the screenplay. Since the movie’s initial 2006 release, 300 has been associated with numerous well-known statements that have gained notoriety, contributing to the character and actor advancement of everybody involved.

300: Rise Of an Empire Is Worth Watching for Fans Of 300 & Historical Action Epics

Fans of the original will enjoy the sequel

Even though 300: Rise of an Empire has received mixed reviews, some people still think it is worth seeing. As 300 Rise of an Empire expands the world and resurrects the tone and style of the Zack Snyder film and the original books, fans of the first 300 will find a lot to enjoy.

Additionally, because 300: Rise of an Empire has many of the main elements of the genre, fans of historical action epics in general will love it. To provide the impression of being more epic, akin to the original 300, 300: Rise of an Empire incorporates additional features in addition to exploring the historical story of the conflicts it depicts. So, while the film may not be a hit with everyone, there are fans out there who will love 300: Rise of an Empire.

300: Rise of an Empire (2014)

300: Rise of an Empire, which is based on Frank Miller’s most recent graphic novel “Xerxes,” chronicles the Greek commander Themistokles’ attempts to bring all of Greece together by spearheading the initiative that will turn the tide of the battle. Themistokles faces out against the vast invading Persian troops under the direction of the deadly Artemisia, the vindictive commander of the Persian navy, and the mortal-turned-God Xerxes in the film.

Director: Noam Murro

Release Date: March 5, 2014

Studio(s): Warner Bros. Pictures

Distributor(s): Warner Bros. Pictures

Writers: Zack Snyder , Kurt Johnstad, Frank Miller

Cast: Sullivan Stapleton, Eva Green, Lena Headey, Hans Matheson, Callan Mulvey, David Wenham

Runtime: 102 minutes

Franchise(s): 300

prequel(s): 300

300: Rise Of an Empire’s Timeline & How It Fits into The Original Movie’s Events Explained

The follow-up to Zack Snyder’s 300, 300: Rise of an Empire, has a far more nuanced relationship to the original film’s timeline than a typical sequel would have. Rise of an Empire is a peculiar sequel in many respects. For instance, Snyder did not return to helm Rise of an Empire, even though the film did have a few returning characters. Rise of an Empire has a strong connection to 300, despite being an unconventional sequel. However, the relationship between them is not always evident, particularly when considering the chronological order of the duology.

I Fully Believe Eva Green Saved The 300 Sequel from Failure

The 300 sequel is just so phony; I never imagined 300: Rise of an Empire could catch lightning in a bottle twice. The 2007 historical epic directed by Zack Snyder chronicles the Battle of Thermopylae using influence from Frank Miller’s seminal graphic novels. King Leonidas led 300 Spartans in Thermopylae, a pivotal battle in the Greco-Persian Wars, against the Persian “God-King” Xerxes. Zack Snyder again co-wrote the extravagant screenplay for 300: Rise of an Empire with Kurt Johnstad, despite not returning to helm the 300 sequels.

Zack Snyder’s style-over-substance filmmaking style was solidified with the stunning $456 million that 300 made at the box office, despite receiving mixed reviews from reviewers and Greek historians alike. Even though I think the characters are a little bland, the stylized epic perfectly captures the essence of the comic novel with its intense slow-motion scenes and generous helpings of blood and gore. When 300: Rise of an Empire opened in theaters little under ten years later, it took in $337.6 million at the box office and received mostly unfavorable reviews. Nevertheless, I do find one thing I like: Eva Green’s Artemisia.

300: Quotes That Will Live on In Infamy

Zack Snyder’s chic historical action film features some of the most memorable statements around, rivaling even the most spectacular war scenes. One of the biggest conflicts in history, the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BCE, is narrated in the 2007 adaptation of the Frank Millar graphic novel of the same name. The formidable Leonidas (Gerard Butler) and a few of his Greek allies, leading a force of 300 Spartan warriors, took up position in the Thermopylae narrow pass and repelled the armies of the Persian god-king Xerxes I (Rodrigo Santoro), whose numbers were estimated to be between 200,00 and 2 million.

Zack Snyder is the director of the film, which masterfully recreates the breathtaking illustrations from Frank Miller’s original graphic novel. 300 is an exciting display of artistic cinematography and military prowess. Along with being an exciting glimpse at the ridiculous yet fascinating discipline of the Spartan army, it is also a wonderful underdog narrative. The film 300 manages to maintain its focus on its graphics while delivering a few memorable phrases that show the Spartan way of life, the thrill of combat, and unwavering bravery in the face of overwhelming odds.

The True Story Of 300: Rise of An Empire’s Battles of Artemisium & Salamis

Though it is not often the most accurate historical epic, 300: Rise of an Empire is one of the genre’s most visually striking films. In addition to telling the story of the Battle of Thermopylae, Rise of an Empire serves as a complementing narrative about other conflicts that were taking place concurrently with 300. Given how skillfully 300: Rise of an Empire captured its historical moment, Zack Snyder’s current consideration of a second 300 sequel set in a different era may provide insight into how the subject will be handled in the follow-up.

The Battle of Artemisium and the Battle of Salamis, two of the most significant engagements of the Greco-Persian War, are the main subjects of 300: Rise of an Empire. Since these were actual historical occurrences, accounts of each of those fights are largely trustworthy. Some of the historical errors in 300: Rise of an Empire are also present in the original film, but it seems sense that some artistic license was taken with the conflicts to create a more engaging story. Although the finished work was captivating, the events themselves made for a highly fascinating tale in and of themselves.